Hello all,
I'm currently running 94 octane (93 octane + 10% ethanol); with my last car, I took 4 years of fill-ups and economy measurements recorded with fuelly and observed approximately 5% better MPGs with 94 octane. I'm hoping for more concrete evidence (Knock retard logs or dynos) that will definitively show some evidence of the stock ECU tuning on a stock car. If that isn't available already, I do have Torque (APP for reading OBD2 on phone) and an OBD2 reader. I can certainly run some logs...hopefully there is a knock retard value. I had to go by the timing advance (provided by VVT signals on the Spec-V.
Please refrain from turning this into a discussion of "that isn't what octane means", "ethanol is good/bad" because there are just way too many already to list and the SRT/petrochemical engineers have already done that homework for us.
Thank you!
I'm currently running 94 octane (93 octane + 10% ethanol); with my last car, I took 4 years of fill-ups and economy measurements recorded with fuelly and observed approximately 5% better MPGs with 94 octane. I'm hoping for more concrete evidence (Knock retard logs or dynos) that will definitively show some evidence of the stock ECU tuning on a stock car. If that isn't available already, I do have Torque (APP for reading OBD2 on phone) and an OBD2 reader. I can certainly run some logs...hopefully there is a knock retard value. I had to go by the timing advance (provided by VVT signals on the Spec-V.
Please refrain from turning this into a discussion of "that isn't what octane means", "ethanol is good/bad" because there are just way too many already to list and the SRT/petrochemical engineers have already done that homework for us.
Thank you!
Comment