Edit: Now online link:
The Abarth 500 "Road Test" is spread across 3 pages but includes limited information. Much space is taken up by its appearance, some history, and little specific about its ride & handling....just the numbers with little about how it feels, rides, etc.
The writer enjoyed the engine, that the Abarth's grip was "impressive" and "stays much flatter". OTOH, he said that the Abarth understeered more and was "a little less playful" than the Sport.
Another extended bash ("disappointed") of the driving position being old-school Italian long reach (why couldn't they have spent an extra $50 per car & installed a reach adjustment for the steering wheel?).
Ended with "As a complete package, the Abarth is a solid choice for those who want a hot hatch that stands out from the Coopers and GTIs of the world. For those dyed-in-the-wool Fiat and Abarth fans, it will be the only choice".
I wholeheartedly agree with that last sentiment.
Exterior photographs of the Rosso version, small one of the dash, and none of the seats. The pictures take up more room than the writing. It would be interesting to know the peak g's it pulled since it was equipped with the 17" wheel/tires. (I still haven't seen ONE picture of the NA Abarth wearing its standard 16" wheels).
Here are some of the specs they give:
0-60 6.8 seconds
1/4 mile 15.3 Seconds @ 89.8 mph
Braking 60-0 117 ft.
Lateral g's 0.86 g (avg)
Curb Weight 2564 lb (64/36%)
Base price $21,500 (est)
Price as tested $23,000 (est)
EPA Mileage 27/32 mpg (est)
I'm pleasantly surprised they got 0-60 below 7 seconds, obviously gets there w/o shifting to third. BTW, nothing at all in the Feb issue of C&D. I don't know if MT jumped the gun or just got it out first.
Cheers
The Abarth 500 "Road Test" is spread across 3 pages but includes limited information. Much space is taken up by its appearance, some history, and little specific about its ride & handling....just the numbers with little about how it feels, rides, etc.
The writer enjoyed the engine, that the Abarth's grip was "impressive" and "stays much flatter". OTOH, he said that the Abarth understeered more and was "a little less playful" than the Sport.
Another extended bash ("disappointed") of the driving position being old-school Italian long reach (why couldn't they have spent an extra $50 per car & installed a reach adjustment for the steering wheel?).
Ended with "As a complete package, the Abarth is a solid choice for those who want a hot hatch that stands out from the Coopers and GTIs of the world. For those dyed-in-the-wool Fiat and Abarth fans, it will be the only choice".
I wholeheartedly agree with that last sentiment.
Exterior photographs of the Rosso version, small one of the dash, and none of the seats. The pictures take up more room than the writing. It would be interesting to know the peak g's it pulled since it was equipped with the 17" wheel/tires. (I still haven't seen ONE picture of the NA Abarth wearing its standard 16" wheels).
Here are some of the specs they give:
0-60 6.8 seconds
1/4 mile 15.3 Seconds @ 89.8 mph
Braking 60-0 117 ft.
Lateral g's 0.86 g (avg)
Curb Weight 2564 lb (64/36%)
Base price $21,500 (est)
Price as tested $23,000 (est)
EPA Mileage 27/32 mpg (est)
I'm pleasantly surprised they got 0-60 below 7 seconds, obviously gets there w/o shifting to third. BTW, nothing at all in the Feb issue of C&D. I don't know if MT jumped the gun or just got it out first.
Cheers
Comment